- The Merge
- Posts
- š· Under the Sea
š· Under the Sea
WARNO: Weāre waaay low on gas and heading to the tanker to refuelāso there will be no emails next week. Weāll be back to dropping knowledge bombs in your inbox on Sunday March 24th.
āļø FIGHTER PILOT PODCAST. Check out the latest episode of the FPP, where I join host āJello-Oā to talk about Robot Wingmen.
š§Ā THE MERGE PODCAST! Speaking of podcast, we have one too. Grab it the show where you get your content: Spotify,Ā Apple,Ā Pandora,Ā iHeartRadio, and even YouTube.
Donāt forget to leave a rating and review!
Credit: submarinecablemap.com
The Undersea Cable Cold War
DYK that upwards of 95 percent of internet traffic flows through a network comprised of 490+ undersea cables spanning a whopping 93 million miles?
In a world where information is like oxygen, these cables have immense strategic valueāand military interest.
Messing with Cables
Back in 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea, they immediately started to lay an undersea cable to connect Crimea to Russiaās internet and cut it off from the western world.Ā
Last year, Taiwan suspected that Chinese ships cut internet cables going to some of its outlying islands.
This isnāt new though. The US has used cable-cutting tactics in its war strategies since the late 1890s (thatās not a typo). During the Spanish-American War, the US led cable-cutting missions to isolate Cuba and to sever communications between the Philippines and Hong Kong. By World War I, cable-cutting was part of everyoneāsĀ playbook.
Over the past several years, China and Russia have increased operations near sensitive undersea cables.
Thanks to their location, length, and size, these cables are highly vulnerable to malicious intentāand accidents.
Three of these sensitive fiber optic cables were recently damaged in the Red Sea, a result of the ongoing conflict in Yemen. The cables were damaged by an anchor from the cargo vessel Rubymar, which was struck by Houthi missiles and abandoned by its crew. Ā
Undersea cables arenāt just vulnerable to attack or damageāthey can also be tapped and exploited.
During the Cold War, the US had an undersea Soviet wiretapping mission called Operation Ivy Bells that went undetected for a decade (until an NSA employee sold the secret to the Soviets).
Protect The Net
Various alliances have been formed to protect, monitor, and build new connections to maintain the flow of information.
The US, Japan, and Australia are jointly funding a 1,400-mile undersea cable to connect Micronesia, Nauru, and Kiribati to counter growing Chinese influence in the region. Similarly, the same group + India has a Quad partnership for improving Pacific cable connectivity and resilience.
Over in Europe, the UK and Norway are also increasing their cooperation to protect the infrastructure of undersea communication. France, Europeās most connected country, is bolstering its underwater securityĀ efforts by investing in drones, robots, and sub-aquatic vessels. NATO, spooked by the Nord Stream pipeline attacks, now has an effort to coordinate collection activities for vulnerable undersea cables and pipes.
However, not all cables are government-owned. Key players like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft are all building their own undersea cables. Today, these tech companies have stakes in roughly 10 percent of the worldās undersea network.
Now What
It seems like the best defense is a good offenseāsimply laying more cables to improve the networkās robustness and resilience.
What about space? Satellite-based broadband from Starlink, OneWeb, Kuiper, etc. sounds like promising alternatives to laying cables across the world. Still, the reality is they are built to offer services in places impractical for running cables. They are not structured to take over the global demands of cabled internet.
Check out this interactive map of all the worldās undersea cables to get a better idea.
To learn more about the rapidly evolving Cold War under the sea, hereās a good read (with graphics!)
TRIVIA
Kleenex, the global brand synonymous with facial tissue, was initially developed to solve what military problem?
On the Radar
Palantir won the Army contract for the TITAN next-gen targeting system. The Tactical Intelligence Targeting Access Node (TITAN) is a battlefield system that will aggregate data from space and terrestrial sensors for long-range precision targeting and other battlefield planning. The $178m contract is to build 10 prototypes, and if that goes well, full production in 2026 for 100-500 units.
The Mergeās Take: Stated another way, data analytics software maker Palantir won an Army program to build a truck-based mobile battle management systemāone of the first-ever āsoftware-primedā programs of record. Palantirās sub-contractors include Northrop Grumman (systems integration), L3Harris (communications), Anduril Industries (hardware), and a few others. The next 24 months will be fun to watchāthatās quite a herd of cats to tend to.
Ā
A group of Ukrainian and American companies have launched the Military Innovation Technology Solutions (MITS) Program to develop Ukraineās defense capabilities by investing in small tech companies with $200k investments, split evenly for investment in startups and expertise from American University Kyiv.
The Mergeās Take: Thereās too little info on this to pass judgement, but on the surface, it seems more like a way for investors to spread bets across (very) early-stage defense tech and less about accelerating solutions to warfighters. The $100K startups would get just doesnāt seem like itās worth the time to do the paperwork. We could be totally wrong though.
Ā
The Marine Corps is putting jamming pods on its MQ-9s and General Atomics received a $31m Navy contract to get started.
The Mergeās Take: The lack of any defensive measures is one of the reasons the Air Force MQ-9s keep getting shot down. Looks like the Marine Corps is taking that lesson and doing something about it, which is great to see from the crayon-eaters. And if youāre confused, yes, the Marine Corps has MQ-9 Reapersāthey plan to operate 20 of them.
Ā
Rearming US Navy ships at sea is weirdāand not a thing in most cases. Vertical Launching System (VLS) cells, the most capable part of a shipās air-launched arsenal, currently have no way to be reloaded at sea.
The Mergeās Take: The VLS design was optimized for simplicity and capacity, not rearmament. This is a significant blind spot in a Navy built to project power across oceans. Where thereās a pain point thereās an opportunity. OBTW, Chinaās Navy likely has the same issue, but itās much less a factor since theyāre playing a home game.
They Said It
āEngineers working on manned aircraft, we hope over time can also come to work on unmanned aircraft. We still need engineering talent.ā
Knowledge Bombs
China is increasing its defense budget by 7.2% (the US defense budget increase is limited to 1%)
The F-35A was certified to carry B61-12 nuclear bombs (pic!)
The Pentagon cleared the V-22 to start flying again after a 3-month grounding
The Space Force is looking for smaller, cheaper GNSS satellites to augment the existing GPS constellation
Patria will build a site in Finland to assemble F-35 fighter jets
Europe released its first-ever defense industrial strategy, which includes $1.6B to get started (the US defense industrial strategy we recently covered has no funding associated with it)
BlackSky won a defense contract to supply thousands of multi-frame burst images to train AI models to find and track ground-moving targets from space-based imagery
šEarn Free Merch!šĀ
Hey. Don't keep us a secret!
Share the Merge = earn free swag. It's that simple.
You currently have 0 referrals, only 3 away from receiving Stickers.
Or copy and paste this link: https://themerge.co/subscribe?ref=PLACEHOLDER
ANSWER
Kleenex originated from a demand for cotton alternatives to bandages during World War I. The solution did the job, but also turned out to be an effective filter for gas masks too.